Social Media Harm Litigation | Case Generation
6,000+ Retainers Signed for People Harmed By Social Media Platforms
Make the biggest impact on these litigations and bring justice to more survivors with a case gen campaign built by the legal marketing agency with 18 years' experience.
6K+
Signed Cases
24+
Campaigns
18+
Years Experience
This page is for licensed law firms and legal professionals only. If you were harmed by social media, this is not the right resource for you.
Get An Estimated Cost Per Case
Takes 2 minutes. We'll follow up ASAP.
Our Track Record
Real acquisition data from the 6,000+ retainers we've helped sign, not projections.
Most claimants are naming multiple platforms, not just one. Campaigns built around a single defendant leave case value behind, and campaigns built without this data pay more for every retainer.
97%
Named Instagram
84%
Named TikTok / YouTube
77%
Named SnapChat
MDL 3047 and JCCP 5255
Why This Docket? Why Now?
A Docket Still Growing Every Month
MDL 3047 reached 3,137 pending actions in August 2026, up from roughly 2,400 in March. More than 3,300 additional cases are pending in California state court. School district bellwethers are now reported set for February 2027. Firms building inventory during this window set their acquisition costs before the market crowds.
Section 230 Stopped Working
On August 10 the Ninth Circuit rejected the platforms' attempt to reverse the ruling forcing them to face more than 3,000 federal suits. In June, Judge Kuhl refused to overturn the first plaintiff verdict, rejecting the argument that federal immunity or free speech protections block these claims.
Juries And Regulators Already Priced The Conduct
A Los Angeles jury awarded $6 million in K.G.M. v. Meta and YouTube in March, the first verdict of its kind. A New Mexico jury returned $375 million against Meta on state consumer protection claims. On August 26, Meta agreed to pay up to $16.7 billion to resolve state attorney general claims. None of the personal injury or school district claims are covered by that agreement.
How We're Different
You Don't Need Another Lead Vendor
You need a partner who builds a campaign around your firm's criteria and budget, not a shared pool split with a dozen other firms.
| Shared Lead Vendor | TSEG Partnership | |
|---|---|---|
| Lead exclusivity | Sold to multiple firms | Exclusive to your firm |
| Campaign design | One-size-fits-all | Built around your firm's criteria & budget |
| Reporting | Lead counts only | Full funnel: spend, qualified leads, signed retainers, ROI |
| Track record | Overnight startup | 18 years legal marketing experience |
| Pricing | Bid per shared lead | Competitive quote, fixed to your docket |
Shared Lead Vendor
TSEG Partnership
Lead exclusivity
Sold to multiple firms
Exclusive to your firm
Campaign design
One-size-fits-all
Built around your firm's criteria & budget
Reporting
Lead counts only
Full funnel: spend, qualified leads, signed retainers, ROI
Track record
Overnight startup
18 years legal marketing experience
Pricing
Bid per shared lead
Competitive quote, fixed to your docket
How It Works
From Discovery Call To Signed Case
01
Discovery Call
We learn your firm's social media harm case criteria, budget, and intake capacity.
02
Custom Campaign Build
We design a multi-channel campaign across across the channels still open to this litigation, all built to your specs.
03
Qualified Lead Delivery
We connect with affected families, screen them against MDL and JCCP case criteria, and you get retainers to sign.
04
Transparent Reporting
Track spend, qualified leads, signed cases and projected returns every step of the way.
What Firms Say
Trusted By Mass Tort Firms Nationwide
“I've worked with TSEG for years. Their customer service is exceptional, and we've had a lot of success in our advertising. I mostly appreciate their transparency when it comes to cost. Highly recommend !”
Patrick Hotze
Hotze Runkle PLLC
“Can't say enough! I'm always impressed with the dedication to figuring out the best method of advertising for the highest return, and how to maximize every dollar.”
Ashlea Schwarz
Paul LLP Trial Attorneys
“I could not be happier with the results. TSEG explained to me their unique strategy that allows them to drive impressive results month-over-month with great case acquisition costs. I have since then run multiple mass tort litigations with TSEG without hesitation, they put their expert skills to work and I couldn’t be happier with the overwhelming results.”
David Franco
Franco Law PLLC
“Wish we would have started years ago. Excellent results. Transparent, helpful, insightful, and they operate with great integrity.”
Kevin L. Edwards
DFW Injury Lawyers
FAQ
Common Questions From Firms
Yes. Every lead we generate for your social media harm docket is built around your firm's criteria and reserved exclusively for you. Never sold to a shared pool.
Cost depends on your budget, targeting, and how competitive your market is. Book a discovery call and we'll walk you through a quote built to your docket.
The Ninth Circuit cleared the federal docket to proceed, filings climbed roughly 30% between March and August, and school district bellwethers are set for early 2027. Every one of those moves brings a resolution framework closer, and acquisition costs rarely get cheaper as a docket matures.
Generally a claimant who began using one or more platforms before age 18, used them heavily, and has documented mental health treatment tied to that period. Records, therapy notes and prescription history strengthen a claim. We screen to whatever criteria your firm sets.
Almost every claimant in this litigation submits on their own behalf rather than through a parent, and most are young adults describing something difficult. Our screening is built for that conversation, because the first contact shapes whether they trust your firm.
No. The August agreement resolves claims brought by state attorneys general. Personal injury claims and school district litigation are not covered by it. Those dockets are still open and still growing.
